2 May 2019
The following results were declared by the returning officer:
|Hackwell Gary JohnGary John Hackwell||Conservative||1,565||19.7%|
|Doe Howard FrancisHoward Francis Doe *||Conservative||1,527||19.2%|
|Barrett RogerRoger Barrett||Conservative||1,388||17.5%|
|Appleton Jean Katherine ShirleyJean Katherine Shirley Appleton||Ukip||682||8.6%|
|Chatfield Alexandra GraceAlexandra Grace Chatfield||Labour||610||7.7%|
|Carman David JohnDavid John Carman||Labour||601||7.6%|
|Davis TomTom Davis||Independent||559||7.0%|
|Peake EddieEddie Peake||Labour||496||6.2%|
|Walters MikeMike Walters||Liberal Democrat||312||3.9%|
|Peacock Roger JamesRoger James Peacock||Christian Peoples Alliance||198||2.5%|
* Denotes a councillor standing for re-election
To order the candidates by name, party or number of votes received, click on the appropriate column heading.
The number of votes rejected and not counted at this election was:
|Want of official mark||3|
|Voting for more than the permitted number of candidates||2|
|Writing or marks by which the voter could be identified||0|
|Unmarked or voided for uncertainty||6|
Vote share for the ward is calculated using the "top vote" method, i.e. using only the candidate from each party with the highest number of votes.
|« 7 May 2015|
The Local Government Boundary Commission for England are currently reviewing Medway's ward boundaries. The new boundaries are expected to increase the number of councillors in Medway from 55 to 59 and will be introduced for the next elections to Medway council in 2023. They have launched a public consultation for residents and organisations in Medway to help them decide where the boundaries should be drawn. The consultation is open until 2 March 2020, with draft recommendations due to be published in June 2020. You can have your say on the new boundaries by clicking the button below, which will take you to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England's consultation.
Medway Elects is not affiliated with the Local Government Boundary Commission for England and is not responsible for the content of their website or the conduct of their boundary review.