5 May 2005
The following results were declared by the returning officer:
|Jonathan Rowland Shaw *||Labour||18,387||43.7|
|Anne Margaret Jobson||Conservative||16,055||38.2|
|Debra Anne Enever||Liberal Democrats||5,744||13.7|
|Jeffery Stuart King||Ukip||1,226||2.9|
|Michael Ian Russell||English Democrat||668||1.6|
* Denotes member of parliament standing for re-election
To order the candidates by name, party or number of votes received, click on the appropriate column heading.
Election Expenses by Candidate
Candidates have individual limits on the amount they can spend during the election campaign. The limit for each candidate in Chatham and Aylesford in 2005 was £12,005.48 for the short campaign (the period beginning the day the individual officially becomes a candidate).
|Candidate||Short Campaign||Total Expenses||£ per Vote|
|Jonathan Rowland Shaw||£10,877.00||£10,877.00||£0.59|
|Anne Margaret Jobson||£7,860.57||£7,860.57||£0.49|
|Michael Ian Russell||£1,056.08||£1,056.08||£1.58|
|Debra Anne Enever||£1,042.63||£1,042.63||£0.18|
|Jeffery Stuart King||£616.00||£616.00||£0.50|
To order the candidates by name, amount spent or the cost per vote received, click on the appropriate column heading.
|Previous election||Next election|
|« 7 June 2001||6 May 2010 »|
The Local Government Boundary Commission for England are currently reviewing Medway's ward boundaries. The new boundaries are expected to increase the number of councillors in Medway from 55 to 59 and will be introduced for the next elections to Medway council in 2023. They have launched a public consultation for residents and organisations in Medway to help them decide where the boundaries should be drawn. The consultation is open until 2 March 2020, with draft recommendations due to be published in June 2020. You can have your say on the new boundaries by clicking the button below, which will take you to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England's consultation.
Medway Elects is not affiliated with the Local Government Boundary Commission for England and is not responsible for the content of their website or the conduct of their boundary review.