23 February 2012
A report to council provided details of the council plan 2012-2013. The plan had been developed by taking into account recent developments including continuing financial pressures, the Munro review of child protection and changes in the education and health systems. It was noted that monitoring of the council plan would continue on a quarterly basis, focusing on the key measures of success.
The business support overview and scrutiny committee considered this report on 2 February 2012 and the views of the committee were set out in paragraph 6 of the report. The cabinet had considered this report on 14 February 2012 and its recommendation to council was set out in paragraph 12 of the report.
It was noted that a diversity impact assessment screening had been undertaken on the draft plan. It was found that there was no need to carry out a full assessment. It was noted that officers would continue to assess and monitor the plan, both prior to its agreement by council, and throughout the life of the plan, to ensure compliance with all statutory requirements.
On being put to the vote, the motion was carried.
Votes by Councillor
To view the list of councillors who voted in favour or against the motion, those who abstained and those who were absent, click on the appropriate heading.
The Local Government Boundary Commission for England are currently reviewing Medway's ward boundaries. The new boundaries are expected to increase the number of councillors in Medway from 55 to 59 and will be introduced for the next elections to Medway council in 2023. They have launched a public consultation for residents and organisations in Medway to help them decide where the boundaries should be drawn. The consultation is open until 2 March 2020, with draft recommendations due to be published in June 2020. You can have your say on the new boundaries by clicking the button below, which will take you to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England's consultation.
Medway Elects is not affiliated with the Local Government Boundary Commission for England and is not responsible for the content of their website or the conduct of their boundary review.