Rochester Airport: Masterplan (Adjournment)

23 January 2014

Motion

The council has prepared and consulted on a draft masterplan to guide development on land at and bordering Rochester Airport. This report sets out the comments received during the consultation, suggests responses to the issues raised and seeks full council approval to adopt the masterplan.

Under Council Rule 11.6.3, Councillor Maple, supported by Councillor Murray, proposed a motion to adjourn the debate on this item (to a special council meeting).

On being put to the vote, the motion was lost.

Vote Result

Votes by Councillor

For For For 19

The following councillors voted in favour of the motion:

Against Against Against 32

The following councillors voted against the motion:

Absent Absent Absent 4

The following councillors were absent from the vote:

To view the list of councillors who voted in favour or against the motion, those who abstained and those who were absent, click on the appropriate heading.

Did you know? Medway Elects is an independent project with no advertising income and no super-rich donors. If you have found our service useful, please consider supporting us with a regular monthly donation on Patreon or buy us a coffee to help support our ongoing running costs!

The Local Government Boundary Commission for England are currently reviewing Medway's ward boundaries. The new boundaries are expected to increase the number of councillors in Medway from 55 to 59 and will be introduced for the next elections to Medway council in 2023. They have launched a public consultation for residents and organisations in Medway to help them decide where the boundaries should be drawn. The consultation is open until 2 March 2020, with draft recommendations due to be published in June 2020. You can have your say on the new boundaries by clicking the button below, which will take you to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England's consultation.

Medway Elects is not affiliated with the Local Government Boundary Commission for England and is not responsible for the content of their website or the conduct of their boundary review.