21 February 2019
A report presented to council provided details of the revenue and capital budget proposals for 2019/20.
The cabinet had considered initial budget proposals on 20 November 2018, which had been developed in accordance with the principles set out in the medium term financial strategy. In accordance with the budget and policy framework rules within the constitution, the overview and scrutiny committees had then considered the cabinet's proposals prior to cabinet's consideration of the draft budget on 5 February 2019.
It was noted that an overarching diversity impact assessment, as set out in appendix 8 to the report, summarised the results of the diversity impact assessments which had been completed for each of the services affected by the proposed budget changes.
In his introduction, the leader of the council, Councillor Jarrett referred to an addendum report which was circulated to advise the council of a correction required to the calculation of the council tax uplift and yield, a series of revisions to the budget requirement and a change to the schedule of parish council precepts, all of which were explained in the report and highlighted in bold in the revised recommendations at paragraph 2 of the addendum report and revised appendices 1, 5, 6 and 6a.
The leader highlighted additional revenue budget headroom as a consequence of these changes as follows:
|Source of funding|
|Additional council tax yield from a revised Band D rate of £1415.43||£253,000|
|Efficiency savings in the Children and Adults Directorate||£300,000|
|Net additional income from Pentagon Centre rents||£1,000 000|
The leader also stated that he would be proposing additional capital schemes which would be funded from capital receipts with the exception of the purchase of the Pentagon Centre which would be funded by prudential borrowing. The Corn Exchange/Guildhall Museum, BRMF (building repairs and maintenance fund) and the Pentagon Centre related to additions to the 2018/19 capital programme whereas the other schemes related to the 2019/20 capital programme.
The leader of the council, Councillor Jarrett, supported by the deputy leader and portfolio holder for housing and community services, Councillor Doe, proposed the recommendations set out in section 2 of the addendum report, together with the following detailed changes listed below in relation to recommendations 2.3 and 2.4 of the addendum report:
More detail to support the revised figures as reflected in the total net expenditure in recommendation 2.3 and shown in the revised summary table at appendix 1 of supplementary agenda 1:
|National Cycling Championship||£87,000|
|Visit Kent campaign||£20,000|
|Feasibility work to create a Rainham community hub||£25,000|
|Civic amenity site improvements||£122,000|
|Reduction in bulky waste charging||£123,000|
|Freezing for permit charges at 2018/19 levels||£50,000|
Approve the proposed capital programme as set out in appendix 3 and section 12 of the original report, amended for the additional capital schemes outlined below:
|Corn Exchange / Guildhall Museum||£590,000|
|Civic amenity site improvements||£133,000|
|Wigmore community hub||£250,000|
|RVS building adaptations||£50,000|
|Purchase of Pentagon Centre||£45,000,000"|
On being put to the vote, the motion was carried.
Votes by Councillor
To view the list of councillors who voted in favour or against the motion, those who abstained and those who were absent, click on the appropriate heading.
The Local Government Boundary Commission for England are currently reviewing Medway's ward boundaries. The new boundaries are expected to increase the number of councillors in Medway from 55 to 59 and will be introduced for the next elections to Medway council in 2023. They have launched a public consultation for residents and organisations in Medway to help them decide where the boundaries should be drawn. The consultation is open until 2 March 2020, with draft recommendations due to be published in June 2020. You can have your say on the new boundaries by clicking the button below, which will take you to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England's consultation.
Medway Elects is not affiliated with the Local Government Boundary Commission for England and is not responsible for the content of their website or the conduct of their boundary review.